Parameters of EMA Compliance and Self-Reported Reactivity in a Longitudinal Study of Young Adult Cannabis and Tobacco Co-Users

Authors

  • Taylor Niznik University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
  • Sarah J. Ehlke, PhD TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
  • Robin Mermelstein, PhD Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W. Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608
  • Ryan Vandrey, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Donald Hedeker, PhD Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
  • Andrea C. Villanti, MPH, PhD Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies and Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ
  • Amy M. Cohn, PhD TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 655 Research Parkway, Suite 400, TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA; 6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1200 Children’s Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104

Abstract

Background: Co-use of cannabis and tobacco has become increasingly popular among young adults. Interactive voice response (IVR) based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) allows for measurement of behavior in or near real-time, but has limitations including non-compliance, missing data, and potential for reactivity (e.g., behavior change) from frequent assessments. Methods: This study examined tobacco and cannabis use characteristics and factors associated with IVR compliance and self-reported reactivity in 97 young adults who reported cannabis and tobacco co-use at baseline and completed daily IVR surveys of co-use behavior at three random times per day for 28 days. Results: Overall IVR compliance was 55%, with a modal compliance of 60%. Compliance rates did not differ across morning, midday, and evening surveys, but significantly declined over time. The sample was divided into high frequency responders (>70% calls completed, n=35) and low frequency responders (<70%, calls completed n=62). There were no differences between high and low frequency responders on any baseline demographic, tobacco use (nicotine dependence severity), alcohol, or cannabis use characteristics (past 30-day frequency of use). Participants were receptive to IVR-based EMA monitoring and, 16.5% reported purposely decreasing nicotine/tobacco use due to monitoring, while 19.6% reported purposely decreasing cannabis use, which predicted lower cannabis use post-EMA monitoring. Conclusions: Real-time assessment of co-use behavior among young adults does not appear to be impacted by specific demographics or substance use severity (nicotine dependence, heavy drinking). Data suggest some predictive utility of IVR-based EMA monitoring on short-term behavior change. More intensive approaches are needed to improve compliance among young adult cannabis and tobacco co-users.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-05

Issue

Section

Original Report